The best Side of pld case laws
The best Side of pld case laws
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there can be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
Many of the volumes (which includes more recent volumes than the library's holdings) will also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load presented to any reported judgment may rely on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
If you find an error within the articles of the published opinion (for instance a misspelled name or a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-thirty day period report into the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety days for that department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided with the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
The different roles of case law in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
States also normally have courts that manage only a specific subset of legal matters, including family law and probate. Case law, also known as precedent or common regulation, is definitely the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending over the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case legislation might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal here district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is just not strictly bound to Stick to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in New York will not be binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions through the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more